Comparison: Linglong Green-Max HP010 vs. Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Linglong (43%). But when it comes to comparing Linglong Green-Max HP010 and Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Linglong Green-Max HP010 was done in 2019, compared to 2016 when was the Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the Green-Max HP010 and the EcowinG ES01 KH27 were tested.
Great news! We found mutual test data
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Mutual tests overview
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Tests used in comparison (1)
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ADAC
|
Summer
|
2019 | 185/65 R15 | View |
Performance comparison
Linglong Green-Max HP010
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
Linglong Green-Max HP010
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
Linglong Green-Max HP010
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
Linglong Green-Max HP010
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
Linglong Green-Max HP010
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
Linglong Green-Max HP010
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
Linglong Green-Max HP010
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
Linglong Green-Max HP010
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
Linglong Green-Max HP010
Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
Performance spider chart
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Dimensions and prices
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
