Segment
1. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle2. Linglong Green-Max HP010 Lowcost
Comparison: Linglong Green-Max HP010 vs. Firestone Roadhawk
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Linglong (43%). The first tyre test of Linglong Green-Max HP010 was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Firestone Roadhawk first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the Green-Max HP010 and the Roadhawk were tested.
| # | Linglong Green-Max HP010
| Firestone Roadhawk
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary2. Linglong Green-Max HP010 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Linglong Green-Max HP010 Satisfactory2. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry driving behavior
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel efficiency
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 | ||
| Linglong Green-Max HP010 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 3,0 | 2,5 | 3,5 | 2,1 | ||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 1,5 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,5 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
