Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium2. Linglong ComfortMaster Lowcost
Comparison: Linglong ComfortMaster vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Linglong (43%). The first tyre test of Linglong ComfortMaster was done in 2024, compared to 2022 when was the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Vibilagare 2024 215/55 R17 test, where both the ComfortMaster and the Ventus Prime 4 were tested.
| # | Linglong ComfortMaster
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R13 - R23 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Comfort
Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 87 | ||||||
| Linglong ComfortMaster | 59 | ||||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4 | 77 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
