Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium2. Laufenn S Fit EQ Lowcost
Comparison: Laufenn S Fit EQ vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Laufenn) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (76%) than Laufenn (32%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 has a better rating of 77% compared to 32% of the Laufenn S Fit EQ. The first tyre test of Laufenn S Fit EQ was done in 2019, compared to 2022 when was the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the S Fit EQ and the Ventus Prime 4 were tested.
| # | Laufenn S Fit EQ
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R23 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Laufenn S Fit EQ 17.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Exemplary2. Laufenn S Fit EQ Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Recommended2. Laufenn S Fit EQ Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
| Laufenn S Fit EQ Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
