Segment
1. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Lowcost2. Debica Presto UHP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 vs. Debica Presto UHP2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Laufenn) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica). The first tyre test of Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 was done in 2021, compared to 2022 when was the Debica Presto UHP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the S Fit EQ+ LK01 and the Presto UHP2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 97% of Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 has B wet grip rating, whereas 67% of Debica Presto UHP2 has A rating.
| # | Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01
| Debica Presto UHP2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R17 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Satisfactory2. Debica Presto UHP2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Debica Presto UHP2 Satisfactory2. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 | 36,5 | 31,9 | |||||
| Debica Presto UHP2 | 36,5 | 29,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
