Segment
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Premium2. Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Laufenn) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (89%) than Laufenn (31%). In this particular case, the Michelin ALPIN 6 has a better rating of 63% compared to 3% of the Laufenn i*Fit + LW31. The first tyre test of Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 was done in 2024, compared to 2019 when was the Michelin ALPIN 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the i*Fit + LW31 and the ALPIN 6 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Michelin ALPIN 6 has B rating.
| # | Laufenn i*Fit + LW31
| Michelin ALPIN 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Premium2. Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 Lowcost
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 4.35
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Exemplary
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Good
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 | 41.1 | - | |||||
| Michelin Alpin 6 | 36.2 | 29.7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||