Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Premium2. Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 Lowcost
Comparison: Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Laufenn) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Laufenn (31%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 has a better rating of 91% compared to 3% of the Laufenn i*Fit + LW31. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the i*Fit + LW31 and the Blizzak 6 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Bridgestone Blizzak 6 has B rating.
| # | Laufenn i*Fit + LW31
| Bridgestone Blizzak 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 | 41.1 | - | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak 6 | 34.6 | 29.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
