Segment
2. Laufenn G Fit 4S Lowcost
Comparison: Laufenn G Fit 4S vs. Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Laufenn) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Italy (Pirelli). Generally, Pirelli allround tyres are slightly better rated (89%) than Laufenn (64%). In this particular case, the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2 has a better rating of 83% compared to 64% of the Laufenn G Fit 4S. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 225/50 R17 test, where both the G Fit 4S and the Cinturato All Season SF2 were tested.
| # | Laufenn G Fit 4S
| Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Laufenn G Fit 4S 14.8
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2 Exemplary2. Laufenn G Fit 4S Good
Worst rating in test
1. Laufenn G Fit 4S Good
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow cornering
Snow handling
Snow traction
Costs
(Overall rating)Price/value
Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
| Laufenn G Fit 4S | 43,6 | 55,2 | |||||
| Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2 | 40,2 | 56 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
