Segment
2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Upper-middle3. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Upper-middle4. Laufenn G Fit 4S Lowcost
Comparison: Laufenn G Fit 4S vs. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S vs. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs. Falken EuroALL Season AS210
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 10.784. Laufenn G Fit 4S 14.8
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Exemplary2. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Test winner3. Laufenn G Fit 4S Good4. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Laufenn G Fit 4S Good2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory3. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Satisfactory4. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Laufenn G Fit 4S | 45,2 | 53,9 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 44,4 | 51,9 | |||||
| Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 | 43,9 | 46,8 | |||||
| Falken EuroALL Season AS210 | 44,4 | 51,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
| Laufenn G Fit 4S | 43,6 | 55,2 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 41,5 | 54,4 | |||||
| Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 | 41,9 | 50,7 | |||||
| Falken EuroALL Season AS210 | 42,2 | 50,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
