Segment
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Upper-middle2. Laufenn G Fit 4S Lowcost
Comparison: Laufenn G Fit 4S vs. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Laufenn) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho allround tyres are slightly better rated (65%) than Laufenn (49%). In this particular case, the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S has a better rating of 64% compared to 49% of the Laufenn G Fit 4S. The first tyre test of Laufenn G Fit 4S was done in 2021, compared to 2020 when was the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 195/55 R16 test, where both the G Fit 4S and the HA32 Solus 4S were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 50% of Laufenn G Fit 4S has C wet grip rating, whereas 89% of Kumho HA32 Solus 4S has B rating.
| # | Laufenn G Fit 4S
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 10.78
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Laufenn G Fit 4S | 45,2 | 53,9 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 44,4 | 51,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
| Laufenn G Fit 4S | 43,6 | 55,2 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 41,5 | 54,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
