• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Laufenn G Fit 4S vs. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S

Table of contents:

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Laufenn) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Laufenn allround tyres are slightly better rated (64%) than Kumho (55%). In this particular case, the Laufenn G Fit 4S has a better rating of 64% compared to 49% of the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S. The first tyre test of Laufenn G Fit 4S was done in 2021, compared to 2020 when was the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 195/55 R16 test, where both the G Fit 4S and the HA32 Solus 4S were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 50% of Laufenn G Fit 4S has C wet grip rating, whereas 89% of Kumho HA32 Solus 4S has B rating.

# Laufenn G Fit 4S
/64%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
/49%

Add to comparison

New comparison
Laufenn
Kumho
DimensionsR13 - R17 R13 - R20
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

2

Mutual tests

Autobild
Autobild Allyear tyre test 2022 195/55 R16
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test39,944,4
Laufenn G Fit 4S45,253,9
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S44,451,9
Show test details
Autobild
Autobild Allyear tyre test 2021 225/50 R17
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test37,650
Laufenn G Fit 4S43,655,2
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S41,554,4
Show test details