Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Premium2. Laufenn G Fit 4S Lowcost
Comparison: Laufenn G Fit 4S vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Laufenn) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook allround tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Laufenn (49%). In this particular case, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 has a better rating of 88% compared to 49% of the Laufenn G Fit 4S. The first tyre test of Laufenn G Fit 4S was done in 2021, compared to 2018 when was the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 195/55 R16 test, where both the G Fit 4S and the Kinergy 4S2 H750 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 50% of Laufenn G Fit 4S has C wet grip rating, whereas 96% of Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 has B rating.
| # | Laufenn G Fit 4S
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Laufenn G Fit 4S | 45,2 | 53,9 | |||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 42,1 | 48 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
| Laufenn G Fit 4S | 43,6 | 55,2 | |||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | 40,3 | 52,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
