Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Uniroyal WinterExpert Upper-middle3. Lassa Snoways 4 Lowcost4. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost
Comparison: Lassa Snoways 4 vs. Matador MP93 Nordicca vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Uniroyal WinterExpert
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Uniroyal WinterExpert 11.253. Matador MP93 Nordicca 23.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory3. Uniroyal WinterExpert Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended3. Uniroyal WinterExpert Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
4. Matador MP93 Nordicca -118%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Lassa Snoways 4 | 37,3 | 27,1 | |||||
| Matador MP93 Nordicca | 37,8 | ||||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 32,8 | 26,3 | |||||
| Uniroyal WinterExpert | 36,9 | 26,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
