Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Lassa Snoways 4 Lowcost3. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Lassa Snoways 4 vs. Matador MP93 Nordicca vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Matador MP93 Nordicca 23.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good3. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow traction
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
4. Matador MP93 Nordicca -118%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Lassa Snoways 4 | 37,3 | 27,1 | |||||
| Matador MP93 Nordicca | 37,8 | ||||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 32,8 | 26,3 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 36,8 | 26,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
