Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle3. Lassa Snoways 4 Lowcost
Comparison: Lassa Snoways 4 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow traction
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Lassa Snoways 4 | 37,3 | 27,1 | |||||
| Falken EuroWinter HS01 | 36,3 | 25,9 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 32,8 | 26,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
