Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle3. Lassa Snoways 4 Lowcost4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Lassa Snoways 4 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good
Worst rating in test
2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2 | 2.1 | |||||
| Lassa Snoways 4 Rating: Poor | 2.7 | 5.2 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good | 3.1 | 2.1 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2.4 | 2.7 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2.9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Lassa Snoways 4 | 37,3 | 27,1 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 32,8 | 26,3 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 36,8 | 26,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
