Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Lassa Snoways 4 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Turkey (Lassa) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Lassa is a brand that belongs to the Bridgestone group. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Lassa (26%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 82% compared to 25% of the Lassa Snoways 4. The first tyre test of Lassa Snoways 4 was done in 2022, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/60 R16 test, where both the Snoways 4 and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Lassa Snoways 4
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R14 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Lassa Snoways 4 Lowcost
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2 | 2.1 | |||||
| Lassa Snoways 4 Rating: Poor | 2.7 | 5.2 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good | 3.1 | 2.1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Lassa Snoways 4 | 37,3 | 27,1 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 32,8 | 26,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||