14 shops, 56 847 products

|

TheTyreLab.com
Vs
Lassa Snoways 4
Bfgoodrich G Force Winter 2

Comparison: Lassa Snoways 4 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Turkey (Lassa) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). Lassa is a brand that belongs to the Bridgestone group. BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Lassa (26%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has a better rating of 81% compared to 25% of the Lassa Snoways 4. The first tyre test of Lassa Snoways 4 was done in 2022, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Snoways 4 and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below.

#	Lassa Snoways 4 /25%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R14 - R20	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

2. Lassa Snoways 4 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

2. Lassa Snoways 4 38

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Lassa Snoways 4 4x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Lassa Snoways 4 15.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Lassa Snoways 4 29.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

2. Lassa Snoways 4 25

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Lassa Snoways 4 2025

Best rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

2. Lassa Snoways 4 ?

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Lassa Snoways 4 ?

Wet

(Overall rating)

Lassa
Snoways 4

81.1%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

70.3%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

2. Lassa Snoways 4 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93.2%

Lassa
Snoways 4

64.7%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

79.3%

Lassa
Snoways 4

75%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Lassa Snoways 4 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Lassa
Snoways 4

74%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71.8%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Lassa
Snoways 4

75%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

75%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

2. Lassa Snoways 4 ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild

Autobild Winter tyre test 2025 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Snow
Best values in test	32.6	27.1
Lassa Snoways 4	38.4	30.5
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	36.0	27.3
Show test details

AUTOBILD

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34.6	28.9
Lassa Snoways 4	39.2	34.1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	37.5	29.4
Show test details

ADAC

ADAC Winter tyre test 2023 205/60 R16

Name	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	2	2.1
Lassa Snoways 4 Rating: Poor	2.7	5.2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2.4	2.7
Show test details

Autobild

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
Lassa Snoways 4	37,3	27,1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,8	25,4
Show test details