Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WS71 Upper-middle2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WS71 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Yokohama (46%). But when it comes to comparing Kumho WinterCraft WS71 and Yokohama BluEarth winter V905, the rating is the same - 0%. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho WinterCraft WS71 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (79%) of the Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Kumho WinterCraft WS71
| Yokohama BluEarth winter V905
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R22 | R13 - R23 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WS71 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WS71 Satisfactory
