Segment
1. Dunlop Winter Premium2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP71 vs. Dunlop Winter
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Dunlop). Dunlop is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Dunlop winter tyres are slightly better rated (88%) than Kumho (63%). The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WP71 was done in 2016, compared to 2025 when was the Dunlop Winter first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho WinterCraft WP71 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (74%) of the Dunlop Winter also have C wet ratings.
| # | Kumho WinterCraft WP71
| Dunlop Winter
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Dunlop Winter 1.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Dunlop Winter Exemplary2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
2. Dunlop Winter 67%
Aquaplaning - cross
2. Dunlop Winter 73%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Dunlop Winter 71%
Wet braking
1. Dunlop Winter 84%
Wet circle cornering
2. Dunlop Winter 63%
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow cornering
1. Dunlop Winter 96%
Snow handling
1. Dunlop Winter 79%
Snow traction
1. Dunlop Winter 96%
Snow braking
1. Dunlop Winter 87%
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
1. Dunlop Winter 81%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Dunlop Winter 87%
Comfort
1. Dunlop Winter 87%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Dunlop Winter 73%
Dry handling
2. Dunlop Winter 64%
