Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than GT (50%). In this particular case, the GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo has a better rating of 61% compared to 55% of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52. The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WP52 was done in 2022, compared to 2024 when was the GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the WinterCraft WP52 and the Radial Winter Pro 2 evo were tested. See more mutual tests below. We also know where WinterCraft WP52 is made - Korea.
| # | Kumho WinterCraft WP52
| GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R0 - R21 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Lowcost
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory2. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Satisfactory
1. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Sufficient2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3 | 2+ | 3 | |||
| GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3 | 3+ | 3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Kumho Wintercraft WP52 | 34.6 | 30.3 | |||||
| GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo | 36.0 | 29.3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||