Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Upper-middle2. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Nokian WR Snowproof
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Nokian (60%). In this particular case, the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ has a better rating of 87% compared to 41% of the Nokian WR Snowproof. The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ was done in 2025, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 77% of Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (86%) of the Nokian WR Snowproof also have B wet ratings.
| # | Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
| Nokian WR Snowproof
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R0 - R21 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian WR Snowproof 11.07
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory
