Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Upper-middle2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost
Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Matador MP93 Nordicca
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Matador (40%). In this particular case, the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ has a better rating of 87% compared to 40% of the Matador MP93 Nordicca. The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ was done in 2025, compared to 2022 when was the Matador MP93 Nordicca first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 77% of Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Matador MP93 Nordicca has C rating.
| # | Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
| Matador MP93 Nordicca
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R0 - R21 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Matador MP93 Nordicca 23.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory
