Segment
2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Upper-middle
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Kumho (63%). In this particular case, the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ has a better rating of 87% compared to 81% of the Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3. The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ was done in 2025, compared to 2022 when was the Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 215/55 R17 test, where both the WinterCraft WP52+ and the W462 Winter i*cept RS3 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 77% of Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
| Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R0 - R21 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Upper-middle
1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Highly recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2 | 2 | 1 | ||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 1 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||