Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Upper-middle2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Falken (58%). The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ was done in 2025, compared to 2017 when was the Falken EuroWinter HS01 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 77% of Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (75%) of the Falken EuroWinter HS01 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
| Falken EuroWinter HS01
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R0 - R21 | R13 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient
