Segment
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium3. Dunlop Winter Premium4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Upper-middle5. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle6. Uniroyal WinterExpert Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Uniroyal WinterExpert vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Dunlop Winter
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Dunlop Winter 1.56. Uniroyal WinterExpert 11.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Dunlop Winter Exemplary2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Very good3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good6. Uniroyal WinterExpert Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
3. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Recommended4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended5. Uniroyal WinterExpert Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | 1 | |||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Rating: Good | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | 2 | |||
| BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 Rating: Good | 3 | 2– | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Uniroyal WinterExpert Rating: Good | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Dunlop Winter Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | 1– | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.1 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ | 33.5 | 28.3 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 36.0 | 27.3 | |||||
| Uniroyal WinterExpert | 34.1 | 28.6 | |||||
| Dunlop Winter | 33.3 | 27.5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
