Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Upper-middle2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle3. Uniroyal WinterExpert Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Uniroyal WinterExpert
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Uniroyal WinterExpert 11.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good3. Uniroyal WinterExpert Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
3. Uniroyal WinterExpert Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | 1 | |||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Rating: Good | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | 2 | |||
| BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 Rating: Good | 3 | 2– | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Uniroyal WinterExpert Rating: Good | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.1 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ | 33.5 | 28.3 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 36.0 | 27.3 | |||||
| Uniroyal WinterExpert | 34.1 | 28.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
