In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Nokian (60%). The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WP51 was done in 2015, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2021 195/65 R15 test, where both the WinterCraft WP51 and the WR Snowproof were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 95% of Kumho WinterCraft WP51 has C wet grip rating, whereas 86% of Nokian WR Snowproof has B rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WinterCraft WP51 is made in Korea and WR Snowproof is made in Finland/Russian Federation.
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ADAC
|
Winter
|
2021 | 195/65 R15 | View |
Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Nokian WR Snowproof
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.