Segment
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Premium2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (89%) than Kumho (63%). The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WP51 was done in 2015, compared to 2019 when was the Michelin ALPIN 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2021 195/65 R15 test, where both the WinterCraft WP51 and the ALPIN 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 95% of Kumho WinterCraft WP51 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Michelin ALPIN 6 has B rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WinterCraft WP51 is made in Korea and ALPIN 6 is made in Spain/Germany.
| # | Kumho WinterCraft WP51
| Michelin ALPIN 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Premium2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 4.35
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Exemplary2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Satisfactory
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Good2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,9 | 1,9 | 2,0 | 2,6 | 2,0 | |
| Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Rating: Sufficient | 3,0 | 3,6 | 2,5 | 2,4 | 2,7 | 3,0 | |
| Michelin Alpin 6 Rating: Good | 2,5 | 1,9 | 2,2 | 2,0 | 3,1 | 2,0 | |
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP51 | 37,8 | 29,8 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin 6 | 34,9 | 29,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||