Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate+ Premium2. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle3. Nokian WeatherProof Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Solus HA31 vs. Nokian WeatherProof vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S H740 vs. Michelin CrossClimate+
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Solus HA31 8.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin CrossClimate+ Exemplary2. Nokian WeatherProof Good +3. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory2. Nokian WeatherProof Sufficient3. Michelin CrossClimate+ Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
| Kumho Solus HA31 | 43,8 | 49,5 | |||||
| Nokian WeatherProof | 44,5 | 51,3 | |||||
| Michelin CrossClimate+ | 39,9 | 48,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 203 | 14 | 37 | 39 | 28 | ||
| Kumho Solus HA31 | 160 | 50 | 37 | 42 | 31 | ||
| Nokian WeatherProof | 203 | 67 | 62 | 42 | 32 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
