Segment
1. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle2. Nokian Seasonproof Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Solus HA31 vs. Nokian Seasonproof
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian allround tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Kumho (55%). But when it comes to comparing Kumho Solus HA31 and Nokian Seasonproof, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Kumho Solus HA31 was done in 2016, compared to 2021 when was the Nokian Seasonproof first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho Solus HA31 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Nokian Seasonproof has B rating.
| # | Kumho Solus HA31
| Nokian Seasonproof
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R14 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho Solus HA31 8.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory2. Nokian Seasonproof Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory2. Nokian Seasonproof Satisfactory
