In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Kumho (55%). But when it comes to comparing Kumho Solus HA31 and Michelin CrossClimate+, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Kumho Solus HA31 was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Michelin CrossClimate+ first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the Solus HA31 and the CrossClimate+ were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho Solus HA31 has C wet grip rating, whereas 89% of Michelin CrossClimate+ has B rating.
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Autobild
|
All season
|
2019 | 225/45 R17 | View |
Kumho Solus HA31
Michelin CrossClimate+
Kumho Solus HA31
Michelin CrossClimate+
Kumho Solus HA31
Michelin CrossClimate+
Kumho Solus HA31
Michelin CrossClimate+
Kumho Solus HA31
Michelin CrossClimate+
Kumho Solus HA31
Michelin CrossClimate+
Kumho Solus HA31
Michelin CrossClimate+
Kumho Solus HA31
Michelin CrossClimate+
Kumho Solus HA31
Michelin CrossClimate+
Kumho Solus HA31
Michelin CrossClimate+
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.