Comparison: Kumho Solus HA31 vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Hankook allround tyres are slightly better rated (82%) than Kumho (55%). The first tyre test of Kumho Solus HA31 was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the Solus HA31 and the Kinergy 4S2 H750 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho Solus HA31 has C wet grip rating, whereas 96% of Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 has B rating.
Great news! We found mutual test data
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Mutual tests overview
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Tests used in comparison (1)
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Autobild
|
All season
|
2019 | 225/45 R17 | View |
Performance comparison
Kumho Solus HA31
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Kumho Solus HA31
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Kumho Solus HA31
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Kumho Solus HA31
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Kumho Solus HA31
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Kumho Solus HA31
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Kumho Solus HA31
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Kumho Solus HA31
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Kumho Solus HA31
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Performance spider chart
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Dimensions and prices
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
