Segment
2. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Solus HA31 vs. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear allround tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Kumho (55%). The first tyre test of Kumho Solus HA31 was done in 2016, compared to 2020 when was the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho Solus HA31 has C wet grip rating, whereas 91% of GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 has B rating.
| # | Kumho Solus HA31
| GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R14 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho Solus HA31 8.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Test winner2. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory2. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Satisfactory
