Segment
1. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle2. Fulda MultiControl Lowcost
Comparison: Kumho Solus HA31 vs. Fulda MultiControl
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda). Generally, Kumho allround tyres are slightly better rated (55%) than Fulda (4%). The first tyre test of Kumho Solus HA31 was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Fulda MultiControl first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the Solus HA31 and the MultiControl were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho Solus HA31 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (88%) of the Fulda MultiControl also have C wet ratings.
| # | Kumho Solus HA31
| Fulda MultiControl
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Solus HA31 8.332. Fulda MultiControl 23.78
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda MultiControl Recommended2. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda MultiControl Recommended2. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
| Kumho Solus HA31 | 43,8 | 49,5 | |||||
| Fulda MultiControl | 45,7 | 57 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
