Segment
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Premium2. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle3. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Upper-middle4. Kleber Quadraxer 2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Solus HA31 vs. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 vs. Kleber Quadraxer 2 vs. Vredestein Quatrac Pro
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Kumho Solus HA31 8.334. Kleber Quadraxer 2 12.63
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Exemplary2. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Exemplary4. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory3. Falken EuroALL Season AS210 Satisfactory4. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Snow handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Comfort
Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
| Kumho Solus HA31 | 43,8 | 49,5 | |||||
| Falken EuroALL Season AS210 | 44,2 | 50,9 | |||||
| Kleber Quadraxer 2 | 44,5 | 52,6 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro | 42,9 | 46,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
