Segment
2. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone allround tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than Kumho (55%). But when it comes to comparing Kumho Solus HA31 and Bridgestone Weather Control A005, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Kumho Solus HA31 was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the Solus HA31 and the Weather Control A005 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho Solus HA31 has C wet grip rating, whereas 76% of Bridgestone Weather Control A005 has A rating.
| # | Kumho Solus HA31
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle
2. Kumho Solus HA31 8.33
1. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 Recommended2. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
1. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 Recommended2. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Kumho Solus HA31 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2+ | 3+ | 3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
| Kumho Solus HA31 | 43,8 | 49,5 | |||||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 | 39,7 | 46,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||