Segment
1. Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ Upper-middle2. Viking FourTech Plus Lowcost
Comparison: Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ vs. Viking FourTech Plus
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Viking). Generally, Viking allround tyres are slightly better rated (56%) than Kumho (55%). In this particular case, the Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ has a better rating of 60% compared to 56% of the Viking FourTech Plus. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 225/50 R17 test, where both the Solus 4S HA32+ and the FourTech Plus were tested.
| # | Kumho Solus 4S HA32+
| Viking FourTech Plus
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R14 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Viking FourTech Plus Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Viking FourTech Plus Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36.8 | 50.5 | |||||
| Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ | 42.5 | 57.9 | |||||
| Viking FourTech Plus | 43.1 | 55.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
