Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Premium2. Vredestein Quatrac Premium4. Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. Vredestein Quatrac vs. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Quatrac Exemplary2. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Test winner3. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Test winner
Worst rating in test
3. Vredestein Quatrac Recommended4. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36.8 | 50.5 | |||||
| Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ | 42.5 | 57.9 | |||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 | 37.9 | 56.4 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac | 40.2 | 55.4 | |||||
| Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 | 41.5 | 55.2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 5.4 | 1.8 | 2.3 | ||||
| Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ Rating: Good | 2.8 | 2.3 | 3 | ||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Good | 2.7 | 2.2 | 2.9 | ||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Good | 2.8 | 2.2 | 3.1 | ||||
| Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Rating: Very good | 2.4 | 1.8 | 2.7 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
