Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Premium2. Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Kumho (55%). In this particular case, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 has a better rating of 91% compared to 60% of the Kumho Solus 4S HA32+. The first tyre test of Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ was done in 2024, compared to 2021 when was the Michelin CrossClimate 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 225/50 R17 test, where both the Solus 4S HA32+ and the CrossClimate 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Michelin CrossClimate 2 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Kumho Solus 4S HA32+
| Michelin CrossClimate 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Premium2. Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ Upper-middle
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Test winner
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36.8 | 50.5 | |||||
| Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ | 42.5 | 57.9 | |||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 | 37.9 | 56.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Points total | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 5.4 | 1.8 | 2.3 | ||||
| Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ Rating: Good | 2.8 | 2.3 | 3 | ||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Good | 2.7 | 2.2 | 2.9 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||