• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Kumho (55%). In this particular case, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 has a better rating of 91% compared to 60% of the Kumho Solus 4S HA32+. The first tyre test of Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ was done in 2024, compared to 2021 when was the Michelin CrossClimate 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 225/50 R17 test, where both the Solus 4S HA32+ and the CrossClimate 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Michelin CrossClimate 2 also have B wet ratings.

# Kumho Solus 4S HA32+
/60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
/91%

Add to comparison

Kumho
Michelin
DimensionsR16 - R18 R15 - R21
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

2

Mutual tests

AUTOBILD
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test36.850.5
Kumho Solus 4S HA32+42.557.9
Michelin CrossClimate 237.956.4
Show test details
ADAC
Name Points totalEnviromental impactDriving safety
Best values in test5.41.82.3
Kumho Solus 4S HA32+
Rating: Good
2.82.33
Michelin CrossClimate 2
Rating: Good
2.72.22.9
Show test details