Segment
1. Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ Upper-middle2. GT RADIAL ClimateActive Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT). Generally, GT allround tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Kumho (55%). In this particular case, the GT RADIAL ClimateActive has a better rating of 83% compared to 60% of the Kumho Solus 4S HA32+. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 225/50 R17 test, where both the Solus 4S HA32+ and the RADIAL ClimateActive were tested.
| # | Kumho Solus 4S HA32+
| GT RADIAL ClimateActive
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R16 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ Upper-middle2. GT RADIAL ClimateActive Lowcost
1. GT RADIAL ClimateActive Exemplary
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36.8 | 50.5 | |||||
| Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ | 42.5 | 57.9 | |||||
| GT Radial ClimateActive | 40.9 | 56.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||