• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ vs. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear allround tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Kumho (65%). In this particular case, the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 has a better rating of 79% compared to 65% of the Kumho Solus 4S HA32+. The first tyre test of Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ was done in 2024, compared to 2020 when was the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 225/50 R17 test, where both the Solus 4S HA32+ and the Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (90%) of the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 also have B wet ratings.

# Kumho Solus 4S HA32+
/65%
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
/79%

Add to comparison

Kumho
GoodYear
DimensionsR16 - R18 R14 - R21
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

AUTOBILD
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test36.850.5
Kumho Solus 4S HA32+42.557.9
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-341.555.2
Show test details
ADAC
Name Points totalEnviromental impactDriving safety
Best values in test5.41.82.3
Kumho Solus 4S HA32+
Rating: Good
2.82.33
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Rating: Very good
2.41.8 2.7
Show test details