Segment
2. Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ vs. Continental AllSeasonContact 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental allround tyres are slightly better rated (73%) than Kumho (55%). In this particular case, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 has a better rating of 88% compared to 60% of the Kumho Solus 4S HA32+. The first tyre test of Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ was done in 2024, compared to 2023 when was the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 225/50 R17 test, where both the Solus 4S HA32+ and the AllSeasonContact 2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (98%) of the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Kumho Solus 4S HA32+
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36.8 | 50.5 | |||||
| Kumho Solus 4S HA32+ | 42.5 | 57.9 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 | 40.0 | 53.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
