Segment
1. Pirelli CARRIER Premium2. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo Premium3. Kumho PorTran KC53 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho PorTran KC53 vs. Pirelli CARRIER vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo Satisfactory2. Pirelli CARRIER Satisfactory3. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo Satisfactory2. Pirelli CARRIER Satisfactory3. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Kumho PorTran KC53 Rating: Sufficient | 3,8 | 3,2 | 2,7 | 2,0 | 2,0 | ||
| Pirelli CARRIER Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,8 | 3,1 | 1,0 | 2,1 | ||
| GoodYear Efficientgrip Cargo Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 0,5 | 2,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
