Segment
1. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo Premium2. Pirelli CARRIER Premium3. Kumho PorTran KC53 Upper-middle4. Kleber Transpro Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho PorTran KC53 vs. Kleber Transpro vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo vs. Pirelli CARRIER
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo Satisfactory2. Pirelli CARRIER Satisfactory3. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo Satisfactory2. Pirelli CARRIER Satisfactory3. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Kumho PorTran KC53 Rating: Sufficient | 3,8 | 3,2 | 2,7 | 2,0 | 2,0 | ||
| Kleber Transpro Rating: Poor | 5,5 | 3,6 | 2,9 | 1,5 | 2,3 | ||
| GoodYear Efficientgrip Cargo Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 0,5 | 2,0 | ||
| Pirelli CARRIER Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,8 | 3,1 | 1,0 | 2,1 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
