Segment
1. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo Premium2. Kumho PorTran KC53 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear). Generally, Goodyear summer tyres are slightly better rated (74%) than Kumho (58%). But when it comes to comparing Kumho PorTran KC53 and Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 215/65 R16 test, where both the PorTran KC53 and the Efficientgrip Cargo were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Kumho PorTran KC53 has C wet grip rating, whereas 76% of Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo has B rating.
| # | Kumho PorTran KC53
| Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R12 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo Premium2. Kumho PorTran KC53 Upper-middle
1. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo Satisfactory2. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
1. Goodyear Efficientgrip Cargo Satisfactory2. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Kumho PorTran KC53 Rating: Sufficient | 3,8 | 3,2 | 2,7 | 2,0 | 2,0 | ||
| GoodYear Efficientgrip Cargo Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,3 | 3,0 | 0,5 | 2,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||