Segment
1. Kumho PorTran KC53 Upper-middle2. Fulda Conveo Tour 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Kumho PorTran KC53 vs. Fulda Conveo Tour 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda). Generally, Fulda summer tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Kumho (58%). But when it comes to comparing Kumho PorTran KC53 and Fulda Conveo Tour 2, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 215/65 R16 test, where both the PorTran KC53 and the Conveo Tour 2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Kumho PorTran KC53 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (50%) of the Fulda Conveo Tour 2 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Kumho PorTran KC53
| Fulda Conveo Tour 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R12 - R17 | R14 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Kumho PorTran KC53 Rating: Sufficient | 3,8 | 3,2 | 2,7 | 2,0 | 2,0 | ||
| Fulda Conveo Tour 2 Rating: Poor | 5,0 | 2,4 | 3,3 | 0,5 | 1,9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
