Comparison: Kumho PorTran CW51 vs. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Italy (Pirelli). Generally, Pirelli winter tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Kumho (63%). But when it comes to comparing Kumho PorTran CW51 and Pirelli CARRIER WINTER, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the PorTran CW51 and the CARRIER WINTER were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 67% of Kumho PorTran CW51 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (63%) of the Pirelli CARRIER WINTER also have C wet ratings.
Great news! We found mutual test data
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Mutual tests overview
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Tests used in comparison (1)
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ADAC
|
Winter
|
2019 | 205/65 R16 | View |
Performance comparison
Kumho PorTran CW51
Pirelli CARRIER WINTER
Kumho PorTran CW51
Pirelli CARRIER WINTER
Kumho PorTran CW51
Pirelli CARRIER WINTER
Kumho PorTran CW51
Pirelli CARRIER WINTER
Kumho PorTran CW51
Pirelli CARRIER WINTER
Kumho PorTran CW51
Pirelli CARRIER WINTER
Kumho PorTran CW51
Pirelli CARRIER WINTER
Kumho PorTran CW51
Pirelli CARRIER WINTER
Kumho PorTran CW51
Pirelli CARRIER WINTER
Kumho PorTran CW51
Pirelli CARRIER WINTER
Performance spider chart
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Dimensions and prices
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
