In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (89%) than Kumho (63%). But when it comes to comparing Kumho PorTran CW51 and Michelin AGILIS ALPIN, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Kumho PorTran CW51 was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Michelin AGILIS ALPIN first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the PorTran CW51 and the AGILIS ALPIN were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 67% of Kumho PorTran CW51 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Michelin AGILIS ALPIN has B rating.
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ADAC
|
Winter
|
2019 | 205/65 R16 | View |
Kumho PorTran CW51
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
Kumho PorTran CW51
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
Kumho PorTran CW51
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
Kumho PorTran CW51
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
Kumho PorTran CW51
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
Kumho PorTran CW51
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
Kumho PorTran CW51
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
Kumho PorTran CW51
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
Kumho PorTran CW51
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
Kumho PorTran CW51
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.