In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Kumho (63%). But when it comes to comparing Kumho PorTran CW51 and Bridgestone Blizzak W810, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the PorTran CW51 and the Blizzak W810 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 67% of Kumho PorTran CW51 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (75%) of the Bridgestone Blizzak W810 also have C wet ratings.
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ADAC
|
Winter
|
2019 | 205/65 R16 | View |
Kumho PorTran CW51
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
Kumho PorTran CW51
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
Kumho PorTran CW51
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
Kumho PorTran CW51
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
Kumho PorTran CW51
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
Kumho PorTran CW51
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
Kumho PorTran CW51
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
Kumho PorTran CW51
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
Kumho PorTran CW51
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
Kumho PorTran CW51
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
Kumho PorTran CW51
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.