These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Autobild
|
All season
|
2021 | 225/50 R17 | View |
However, in Autobild's tests, the tyre achieved a tenth position out of 32. This performance showcases the tyre's strong adaptation to various weather conditions. The model's short braking distances on snow and dynamic wet and dry handling were particularly notable. Its downside lies in its lower mileage and high rolling resistance, which affected its cost-performance balance negatively.
Despite its lower position, the tyre excels in its resistance to aquaplaning, in both straight and cross situations. Its low rolling resistance also makes it a more fuel-efficient option. However, these strengths are overshadowed by its overall performance in comparison to other all-round tyres.
Both models appear not to have a succeeding model that has replaced them as of yet, ensuring their ongoing relevance in the market. It is important to consider an individual car's requirements and usage conditions when choosing between these two options.
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Viking Fourtech
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Viking Fourtech
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Viking Fourtech
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Viking Fourtech
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Viking Fourtech
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Viking Fourtech
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.